South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia

Posted on by
  1. South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia Free
  2. South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia Download
  3. Gamblers Anonymous
  4. South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia Free
  5. Gamblers 20 Questions

Gamblers Anonymous (GA) is a twelve-step program for people who have a gambling problem. The only requirement for membership is a desire to stop gambling.

The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen is a 20-item questionnaire based on DSM-III criteria for pathological gambling. It may be self-administered or administered by nonprofessional or professional interviewers. This definition treads a delicate line between the two types of gambling considered in this chapter, Pathological gambling and Recreational (or Social) gambling. The American Psychiatric Association (APA), (2008) includes Pathological gambling as an 'Impulse.

  • 4Criticism

South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia Free

History[edit]

  1. Shreveport (/ ˈ ʃ r iː v p ɔːr t / SHREEV-port) is a city in the U.S. State of Louisiana. It is the most populous city in the Shreveport-Bossier City metropolitan area. Shreveport ranks third in population in Louisiana after New Orleans and Baton Rouge and 133rd in the U.S.
  2. South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Criticisms of the SOGS are shown to lack merit, to be offset by more important criteria, or to be no longer relevant. The evidence reviewed indicates that the construct of pathological gambling as represented by the SOGS and its.

The organization began in Los Angeles on September 13, 1957. By 2005 there were over 1000 GA groups in the United States, and groups had been established in Mexico, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, New Zealand, Australia, Brazil, Israel, Kenya, Uganda, Korea, Japan and many other locations throughout the world.[1]

Incidence rate and evaluation[edit]

Problem gambling is estimated to occur in 1.6% of the adult population in the United States.[2] GA has a list of twenty questions that can be used to self-diagnose compulsive gambling. The results from their instrument have correlated strongly with other tests that screen for compulsive gambling (e.g. the Total Sensation Seeking Scale, Boredom Susceptibility, Experience Seeking, South Oaks Gambling Screen, and Disinhibition subscales).[3][4]

Hollyoaks is a British soap opera which has been broadcast on Channel 4 since 23 October 1995. It was devised by Phil Redmond, who had also conceived the Channel 4 soap Brookside.The programme is set in the fictional village of Hollyoaks, a suburb of Chester, and is filmed at. In 1996, Cozzetto and Larocque conducted a gambling study on two North Dakota Indian reservations using the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), a 20-item dichotomous measure of 'at-risk' gambling behaviors (Lesieur & Blume, 1987), to test the prevalence of pathological and potentially pathological gambling behaviors.

Effectiveness[edit]

Compared to problem gamblers who do not attend GA, GA members tend to have more severe gambling problems, are older, have higher incomes, are less likely to be single, have more years of gambling problems, have larger debts, have more serious family conflicts, and less serious substance abuse problems.[2] GA may not be as effective for those who have not had significant gambling problems. GA is effective to prevent 'relapses' (inability to remain abstinent from gambling), but not as effective when helping members deal with the consequences of their relapse.[5]

GA spends much of its time and energy counseling members on how to deal with financial and legal problems. GA supports 'pressure relief groups' where members take each other to task and encourage them to 'get honest' with people in their lives and get their affairs in order. Gamblers who are able to moderate their activity are not likely to continue attending GA meetings. GA members who stopped attending meetings were more likely to consider the sharing at the meetings 'meaningless' and were more critical of GA literature. Those who felt particularly elated at their first GA meetings were less likely to continue than those who had a more balanced first impression. GA, therefore, may be most suitable for severe problem gamblers who do not have compounding issues.[6]

USA No Deposit Bonus Codes 2020Get regularly updated USA no deposit bonuses for online casinos in 2020. New usa online casinos with no deposit bonuses money. NoDepositRewards has scoured the Internet and found the best USA no deposit casino codes for you.They are all here in one place so you can easily see which one meets your requirements. From to on the latest slot games, they are all here.Each offer is tested by one of our bonus experts for fairness and transparency. If you're an old hat all the bonuses are listed below. We believe the US no deposit offers listed here offer the best possible chance of turning the bonus into real cash.

Criticism[edit]

Attrition[edit]

Less than 8% of those who initially attend GA remain in the program and abstinent from gambling for over a year.[7] Program participation and abstinence increase if members are involved in additional therapy, or if one or more of their family members are involved in Gam-Anon or Gam-A-Teen.[8][9][10]

Gender bias[edit]

Although the likelihood of attending GA is the same for males and females,[11] GA has been characterized as a predominately male fellowship. The number of female members, however, is increasing and there is an increasing sensitivity within GA to women's attitudes.[6] GA's lack of appeal towards females has been attributed to GA's lack of focus on the principles of spirituality in other twelve-step programs, like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). A causal link, however, has not been shown. GA is often described as more secularized than AA.[12]

South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia Download

Among problem gamblers, it has been found that women are more focused on interpersonal issues, and that social issues were more likely to cause them to 'relapse.' Males more frequently discuss 'external concerns' such as jobs and legal problems, and are more likely to relapse because of substance abuse. Therefore, it does seem plausible that GA's downplaying of spiritual, interpersonal, and psychoemotional issues, inhibits its effectiveness for women.[6][13]

Literature[edit]

Gamblers Anonymous has several approved books used as standard literature in the group. These are some of the most popular examples:

Gambling
  • Gamblers Anonymous (1984). Sharing recovery through Gamblers Anonymous. Los Angeles: Gamblers Anonymous. ISBN0-917839-00-5. OCLC11614655.
  • Gamblers Anonymous (1989). A New Beginning. Los Angeles, California: Gamblers Anonymous. OCLC21416926.
  • Gamblers Anonymous (1994). One day at a time.

Gamblers Anonymous

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Petry, Nancy M. (March 2005). 'Gamblers Anonymous and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies for Pathological Gamblers'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 21 (1): 27–33. doi:10.1007/s10899-004-1919-5. ISSN1573-3602. PMID15789187.
  2. ^ abPetry, Nancy M. (August 2003). 'Patterns and correlates of Gamblers Anonymous attendance in pathological gamblers seeking professional treatment'. Addictive Behaviors. 28 (6): 1049–1062. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00233-2. ISSN0306-4603. PMID12834650.
  3. ^Kuley, Nadia B.; Jacobs, Durand F. (September 1988). 'The relationship between dissociative-like experiences and sensation seeking among social and problem gamblers'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 4 (3): 197–207. doi:10.1007/BF01018332. ISSN1050-5350.
  4. ^Ursua, Maria Prieto; Uribelarrea, Luis Llavona (March 1998). '20 Questions of Gamblers Anonymous: A Psychometric Study with Population of Spain'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 14 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1023/A:1023033924960. ISSN1050-5350. PMID12766432.
  5. ^Brown, R.I.F. (September 1987). 'Dropouts and continuers in Gamblers Anonymous: Part four. Evaluation and summary'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 3 (3): 202–210. doi:10.1007/BF01367441. ISSN1050-5350.
  6. ^ abcFerentzy, Peter; Skinner, Wayne (2003). 'Gamblers Anonymous: A critical review of the literature'. Journal of Gambling Issues. 9. doi:10.4309/jgi.2003.9.9.
  7. ^Stewart, RM; Brown, RI (February 1988). 'An outcome study of Gamblers Anonymous'. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 152 (2): 284–288. doi:10.1192/bjp.152.2.284. ISSN0007-1250. PMID3167353.
  8. ^Petry, Nancy M.; Armentano, Christopher (1 August 1999). 'Prevalence, Assessment, and Treatment of Pathological Gambling: A Review'. Psychiatric Services. 50 (8): 1021–1027. doi:10.1176/ps.50.8.1021. ISSN1075-2730. PMID10445649.
  9. ^Johnson, EE; Nora, RM (December 1992). 'Does spousal participation in Gamblers Anonymous benefit compulsive gamblers?'. Psychological Reports. 71 (3 Pt 1): 914. ISSN0033-2941. PMID1454942.
  10. ^Ciarrocchi, Joseph W.; Reinert, Duane F. (December 1993). 'Family environment and length of recovery for married male members of Gamblers Anonymous and female members of GamAnon'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 9 (4): 341–352. doi:10.1007/BF01014626. ISSN1050-5350.
  11. ^Crisp, Beth R.; Thomas, Shane A.; Jackson, Alun C.; Thomason, Neil; Smith, Serena; Borrell, Jennifer; Ho, Wei-ying; Holt, Tangerine A. (1 March 2000). 'Sex Differences in the Treatment Needs and Outcomes of Problem Gamblers'(abstract page). Research on Social Work Practice. 10 (2): 229–242.
  12. ^Browne, Basil R. (September 1994). 'Really not god: Secularization and pragmatism in Gamblers Anonymous'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 10 (3): 247–260. doi:10.1007/BF02104966. ISSN1050-5350. PMID24234922.
  13. ^Preston, Frederick W.; Smith, Ronald W. (September 1985). 'Delabeling and relabeling in Gamblers Anonymous: Problems with transferring the Alcoholics Anonymous paradigm'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1 (2): 97–105. doi:10.1007/BF01019862. ISSN1050-5350.

Further reading[edit]

  • Campbell, F., & Lester, D. (1999). The impact of gambling opportunities on compulsive gambling: Journal of Social Psychology Vol 139(1) Feb 1999, 126-127.
  • Cunningham, J. A. (2005). Little Use of Treatment Among Problem Gamblers: Psychiatric Services Vol 56(8) Aug 2005, 1024-1025.
  • Ferentzy, P., Skinner, W., & Antze, P. (2006). Recovery in Gamblers Anonymous: Journal of Gambling Issues No 17 Aug 2006, No Pagination Specified.
  • Getty, H. A., Watson, J., & Frisch, G. R. (2000). A comparison of depression and styles of coping in male and female GA members and controls: Journal of Gambling Studies Vol 16(4) Win 2000, 377-391.
  • Lesieur, Henty R.; Rothschild, Jerome (December 1989). 'Children of Gamblers Anonymous members'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 5 (4): 269–281. doi:10.1007/BF01672428. ISSN1573-3602.
  • Petry, N. M. (March 2002). 'Psychosocial treatments for pathological gambling: Current status and future directions'. Psychiatric Annals. 32 (3): 192–196. doi:10.3928/0048-5713-20020301-09.Adesso, V. J. (May 1995). 'Diversity Confronts the Monolith'. PsycCRITIQUES. 40 (5). doi:10.1037/003640.
  • Petry, N. M. (August 2003). 'Patterns and correlates of gamblers anonymous attendance in pathological seeking professional treatment'. Addictive Behaviors. 28 (6): 1049–1062. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00233-2. PMID12834650.
  • Petry, N. M. (Spring 2005). 'Gamblers Anonymous and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies for Pathological Gamblers'. Journal of Gambling Studies. 21 (1): 27–33. doi:10.1007/s10899-004-1919-5. PMID15789187.
  • Petry, N. M.; Litt, M. D.; Kadden, R.; Ledgerwood, D. M. (August 2007). 'Do coping skills mediate the relationship between cognitive-behavioral therapy and reductions in gambling in pathological gamblers?'. Addiction. 102 (8): 1280–1291. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01907.x. PMID17624978.
  • Rossol, J. (2001). 'The medicalization of deviance as an interactive achievement: The construction of compulsive gambling'. Symbolic Interaction. 24 (3): 315–341. doi:10.1525/si.2001.24.3.315.

External links[edit]

  • Works by or about Gamblers Anonymous in libraries (WorldCat catalog)

South Oaks Gambling Screen Wikipedia Free

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gamblers_Anonymous&oldid=926619767'

Gamblers 20 Questions

  1. Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. A. (1991). Gambling in New Zealand-Report to the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, M., & Volberg, R. A. (1992). Frequent Gamblers and Problem Gamblers in New Zealand: Report on Phase Two of the National Survey-Report to the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1996). The New Zealand National Survey of problem and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 143–160.Google Scholar
  4. Allcock, C. (1995). Some ponderings on pathological gambling: An introspective essay. Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Sydney.Google Scholar
  5. Allcock, C. C., & Grace, D. M. (1988). Pathological gamblers are neither impulsive nor sensationseekers. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 22(3), 307–11.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic & Statistical Manual 3rd edition. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  7. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Third edition, revised, DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  8. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Andrews, G. H. C. (1998). Treatments that work in anxiety disorders. [Review]. Medical Journal of Australia, 168(12), 628–34.Google Scholar
  10. Baron, E., Dickerson, M., & Blaszczynski, A. (1995). The Scale of Gambling Choices: Preliminary development of an instrument to measure impaired control of gambling behaviour. Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Sydney.Google Scholar
  11. Battersby, M., & Tolchard, B. (1996). The effects of treatment on pathological gamblers referred to a behavioural psychotherapy unit: I-Changes in psychiatric co-morbidity following treatment. Conference Proceedings, 7th annual conference of the National Association of Gambling Studies, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  12. Blaszczynski, A., & McConaghy, N. (1989). Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gambling. International Journal of Addiction, 24(4), 337–50.Google Scholar
  13. Blaszczynski, A., Steel, Z., & McConaghy, N. (1997). Impulsivity in pathological gambling: the antisocial impulsivist. Addiction, 92(1), 75–87.Google Scholar
  14. Blume, S. B. (1991). Pathological Gambling: Addiction without a Drug. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  15. Bondolfi, G., Osiek, C., & Ferrero, F. (2000). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in Switzerland. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101(6), 473–5.Google Scholar
  16. Dickerson, M. (1993). Internal and External Determinants of Persistent Gambling: Problems in Generalising From One Form of Gambling to Another. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 225–245.Google Scholar
  17. Dickerson, M. G., Baron, E., Hong, S. M., & Cottrell, D. (1996). Estimating the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population: A national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
  18. Duvarci, I., Varan, A., Coskunol, H., & Ersoy, M. A. (1997). DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Diagnosing and Assessing Pathological Gambling in Turkey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13(3), 193–206.Google Scholar
  19. Ladouceur, R. (1992). Prevalence Estimates of Pathological Gamblers in Quebec, Canada. Paper presented at the Gambling Behavior and Problem Gambling: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Risk and Gambling, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  20. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., & Giroux, I. (1999). Prevalence of problem gambling: a replication study 7 years later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44(8), 802–4.Google Scholar
  21. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Letarte, H., Giroux, I., & Jacques, C. (1998). Cognitive treatment of pathological gamblers. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36(12), 1111–9.Google Scholar
  22. Lesieur, H. R. (1994). Epidemiological surveys of pathological gambling: Critique and suggestions for modification. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(4), 385–398.Google Scholar
  23. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–8.Google Scholar
  24. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1990). Characteristics of pathological gamblers identified among patients on a psychiatric admissions service. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 1009–1012.Google Scholar
  25. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1991). Evaluation of patients treated for pathological gambling in a combined alcohol, substance abuse and pathological gambling treatment unit using the Addiction Severity Index. British Journal of Addiction, 86(8), 1017–28.Google Scholar
  26. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1993). Revising the South Oaks Gambling Screen in different settings. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(3), 213–223.Google Scholar
  27. Petry, N. M. (2001). Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 63(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  28. Productivity Commission. (1999). iAustralia's Gambling Industries, Report No. 10, AusInfo, Canberra.Google Scholar
  29. Specker, S. M., Carlson, G. A., Edmonson, K. M., Johnson, P. E., et al. (1996). Psychopathology in pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(1),–81.Google Scholar
  30. Steel, Z., & Blaszczynski, A. (1998). Impulsivity, personality disorders and pathological gambling severity. Addiction, 93(6), 895–905.Google Scholar
  31. Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  32. Tolchard, B., & Battersby, M. W. (1996). The effect of treatment of pathological gamblers referred to a Behavioural Psychotherapy unit: II-Outcome of three kinds of behavioural intervention. Conference Proceedings, 7th annual conference of the National Association for gambling Studies, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  33. Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Ladouceur, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence: mutual influences and common risk factors. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(3), 171–90.Google Scholar
  34. Volberg, R. A. (1991). A Study of Legal Gaming in Connecticut: Problem Gambling.Google Scholar
  35. Volberg, R. A. (1994). The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 237–241.Google Scholar
  36. Volberg, R. A., & Banks, S. M. (1990). A Review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 153–163.Google Scholar
  37. Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 502–505.Google Scholar
  38. Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1989). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Jersey and Maryland. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146(12), 1618–9.Google Scholar
  39. Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1992). Accurately Depicting Pathological Gamblers: Policy and Treatment Implications. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 401–412.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, M. (1992). The Psychology of Gambling. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, M. B., & Dickerson, M. G. (1996). The prevalence of problem and pathological gambling: A critical analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 233–249.Google Scholar